How to Teach a Child to Wait: Self-Control Strategies from Mischel's Experiments

In short
After the first marshmallow test, Walter Mischel and colleagues investigated what exactly helps children wait. The answer: not thinking about the reward and shifting attention to something pleasant. Thinking about the treat shortens waiting — even when it is out of sight.

How the experiment worked
A series of three experiments with preschoolers from the Stanford University nursery school, using the same procedure: wait for the preferred treat or ring a bell and get the less preferred one at once.
  1. Children could distract themselves with a toy while waiting.
  2. Before waiting, children were told what to think about: "fun things" (such as songs and games) or the rewards themselves.
  3. Rewards were out of sight, but children were asked to think about them.
Results
  • Having a toy to play with substantially lengthened waiting.
  • "Fun thoughts" helped children wait a long time even with the rewards in view.
  • Thinking about the rewards shortened waiting, even when they were not visible.
Conclusions and significance for developmental psychology
What matters is not the object itself but how the child mentally represents it. This led to the hot/cool system model (Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999): the "hot" system responds to tempting features ("sweet, tasty"), the "cool" one to neutral or abstract ones ("white, like a cloud"). Children who pictured treats in a "cool" way waited longer (Mischel & Baker, 1975). Waiting also depends on trust in the adult: if a child doubts the promise will be kept, waiting less is rational (Kidd et al., 2013).
What it means for parents
  • Move temptations out of sight and offer an activity while your child waits.
  • Teach "magic thoughts": picture the sweet as a photo, sing a song, invent a game.
  • Keep your promises — children wait more willingly when they know adults can be trusted.
What it means for professionals
These results underpin cognitive reappraisal and attention-training techniques for impulsivity, anger outbursts and self-regulation difficulties in preschoolers, and they translate easily into parent guidance.
References
  • Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., & Aslin, R. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children's decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004
  • Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3
  • Mischel, W., & Baker, N. (1975). Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076272
  • Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., & Zeiss, A. R. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032198
Interested in cooperation or consultation?
Fill out the form and I will contact you shortly:
By clicking the "send" button you agree to our Terms and Conditions
Cesta talcev 5A, Škofja Loka, 4220
Phone: +38651869085
Email: votiakovasvetlana@gmail.com